Click here
for printer-friendly version
Cops can't substitute for mommy and daddy. Neither
can social workers or detention centers. The school
can't replace the home. Professionals can't replace
the family. We hear that all the time. But, in the aftermath
of another deadly shooting at a school by an adolescent,
those simple disclaimers can lead to retreat in the
face of the urgent need for adults to take more responsibility
for this violence. The need is to start listening to
evermore-pressured adolescents and not rush to the legislature
with bills to lock them up at a younger age, after they've
shot and killed.
We've all heard the platitude that "society" can't
replace the immediate family and solve family problems.
But who is society? We are.
From Springfield, Ore., to Jonesboro, Ark., and from
central New Haven to south central Los Angeles -- Americans
are more than ever an extended family. Even with our
cultural diversity, the common ties that bind us grow
stronger. When we see the violence in these schools,
we know these victims could be our kids. Our kids fear
that they could be shot in their schools. This violence
is touching our lives. With these shootings, rural and
suburban America are experiencing what much of urban
America lives with every day: the threat of violence.
When children feel they're not being listened to,
when they feel powerless and are often frightened, they
make a loud noise. Now we are hearing that noise as
gunshots tragically heard around the world.
Consider what it's like for more and more children
growing up today -- in cities or on farms, whether they're
wealthy, middle class or struggling: they're growing
up without a parent truly in their life. In more families
than ever, both parents have to work because of a declining
standard of living for all but the rich. Even in financially
comfortable families, both parents work longer hours
because of the siren call of rampant consumerism.
The percentage of kids living in single-parent families
almost doubled from 15 percent in 1970 to 27 percent
in 1990. Half of all children born in the 1970s and
1980s will have lived in a single-parent home during
part of their childhood.
Very simply, parents have less time to notice the
early-warning signals of trouble. They have less time
to ease these problems with love and nurturing.
What must we do about it as an extended family?
Parents are the best, most-nurturing line of defense
against childhood neglect and trauma. We must enable
parents to obtain help without stigma and without a
bureaucratic nightmare.
Teachers see our kids every day. They need to pay
attention to failing grades, to acting out, to expressions
of confused identity, and other warning signals.
Teachers need backup from school counselors and administrators.
Schools need backup from teams of community cops, psychologists
and probation officers.
Law enforcement must redefine its mission. It must
not be just arresting kids. Police officers should be
getting to know kids on the beat and steering them to
constructive outlets for their growth and energy.
This means cops must know the kids who act out on
the street -- not in condoning petty misbehavior, but
finding the ways to do more than harassing or handcuffing
them.
Police departments must recruit cops who like to work
with kids and help people. This means cops must know
youth workers to match with wayward kids. It means cops
need to keep in touch with teachers, neighbors and parents,
even visiting homes and organizing outings for neighborhood
kids. The new wave of community policing can and should
enable officers on walking beats to carry out this kind
of work.
More cities should adopt the type of partnership New
Haven police started with Yale University earlier in
the decade, linking cops with Yale child psychologists.
Every young child who witnesses a violent incident spends
a year working with a psychologist-officer duo to deal
with the anger and confusion. The long-term results
-- less violence when those kids become adolescents
-- are visible in New Haven.