SUBSCRIBE: Internet Subscription Special
Published 12:01 am PDT Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Story appeared in Web section, Page NONE
Print | E-Mail | Comments (0)
Immediately after Bias' death, the speaker of the House of Representatives, Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill Jr., from the Boston area (where Bias had just signed with the Celtics), issued a demand to his fellow Democrats for anti-drug legislation. Senior congressional staffers began meeting regularly in the speaker's conference room as practically every committee in the House wrote Len Bias-inspired legislation attacking the drug problem. News conferences around the Capitol featured members of Congress extolling their efforts to clamp down on cocaine and crack.
One result was the innocuous-sounding Narcotics Penalties and Enforcement Act, which became the first element of the enormous Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, hurried to the floor a little more than two months after Bias' death. But the effect of the penalties and enforcement legislation was to put back into federal law the kind of clumsy mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses that had been done away with 16 years before. And there they remain, 20 years and several hundred thousand defendants later.
Congress wanted to send several messages by again enacting mandatory minimums: to the Justice Department to be more focused on high-level traffickers; to major traffickers that the new penalties would destroy them; to the voters that members of Congress could fight crime as vigorously as the police and prosecutors. But Congress garbled the message. Instead of targeting large-scale traffickers, it established low-level drug quantities to trigger lengthy mandatory minimum prison terms: five grams (the weight of five packets of artificial sweetener), 50 grams (the weight of a candy bar), 500 grams (the weight of two cups of sugar) or 5,000 grams (the weight of a lunchbox of cocaine). Large-scale traffickers organize shipments of drugs totaling tons -- many millions of grams -- filling tractor-trailers, airplanes and fishing boats.
The Justice Department has compounded the problem by focusing on countless low-level offenders. The U.S. Sentencing Commission reports that only 15 percent of federal cocaine traffickers can be classified as high-level. Seventy percent are low-level. One-third of all federal cocaine cases involve an average of 52 grams, a candy bar-sized quantity of cocaine, resulting in an average sentence of almost nine years in prison without parole.
Not surprisingly, the federal prison population has exploded. From 1954 to 1976, it fluctuated between 20,000 and 24,000. By 1986 it had grown to 36,000. Today it exceeds 190,000 prisoners, up 527 percent in 20 years. More than half this population is made up of drug offenders, most of whom are serving sentences created in the weeks after Len Bias died.
Sadly, the nation's drug abuse situation is not much better after 20 years. Teenagers are using very dangerous drugs at twice the rate they did in the 1980s. The price of cocaine is much lower and the purity much higher, which tells us that the traffickers have become more efficient.
There is a trickle of hope that mandatory sentences as a legacy of Bias' death might come to an end. A handful of conservative members of the House Judiciary Committee have begun to question the wisdom of current mandatory minimum sentencing laws, and some vote against them.
The first round of mandatory minimums for drug offenses, enacted in 1951, was repealed almost 20 years later, with bipartisan support.
Among those who backed repeal was George H.W. Bush, then a congressman from Texas. With his son in the White House, this would be a good time for history to repeat itself, and for this sad legacy of Len Bias' death to finally end.
About the writers:
- Eric E. Sterling, counsel to the House Judiciary Committee from 1979 to 1989, is president of the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation. Julie Stewart is president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums. Their commentary appeared in the Washington Post.
Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
By Melody Gutierrez
Published 12:01 am PDT Friday, June 30, 2006
By Mareva Brown and Sam Stanton
Published 12:01 am PDT Friday, June 30, 2006
By Deb Kollars
Published 12:01 am PDT Friday, June 30, 2006
By Mary Lynne Vellinga and Terri Hardy
Published 12:01 am PDT Friday, June 30, 2006
By Denny Walsh
Published 12:01 am PDT Friday, June 30, 2006
By Sam Amick
Published 12:01 am PDT Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Christina Jewett
Published 12:01 am PDT Tuesday, June 27, 2006
By Christina Jewett
Published 12:01 am PDT Wednesday, June 28, 2006
By Sam Amick
Published 12:01 am PDT Wednesday, June 28, 2006
By Matt Weiser
Published 12:01 am PDT Monday, June 26, 2006
By David S. Broder
Friday, June 30, 2006
By Leonard Pitts
Friday, June 30, 2006
By Kathryn Jean Lopez
Friday, June 30, 2006
By George F. Will
Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Christopher Preble
Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Ben Lieberman
Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Clark Kent Ervin
Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Cal Thomas
Thursday, June 29, 2006
By Ruben Navarrette
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
By Molly Ivins
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
News |
Sports |
Business |
Politics |
Opinion |
Entertainment |
Lifestyle |
Cars |
Homes |
Jobs |
Shopping |
RSS
Contact Bee Customer Service | Contact sacbee.com | Advertise Online | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Help | Site Map
GUIDE TO THE BEE: | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | Contacts | Advertise | Bee Events | Community Involvement
Sacbee.com | SacTicket.com | Sacramento.com
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee, (916) 321-1000
Comments
There are no comments posted so far.
Be the first to add a comment.