Click here for
printer-friendly version
One man is the U.S. Senate's No. 1 drug-pusher, an
ambassador to Asian countries on behalf of duplicitous
producers of an addictive product. The other man spent
a key part of his adult life putting drug dealers behind
bars. Yet, only in the warped world of Washington politics
can the first man -- U.S. Sen. Jesse Helms -- use the
epithet "soft on drugs" to thwart a presidential nomination
to an ambassadorship for the second man -- Massachusetts
(now former) Gov. William Weld.
Helms, tinpot dictator of the Senate's Foreign Relations
Committee, continues to hold up Weld's confirmation
as U.S. ambassador to Mexico by denying him the necessary
committee hearing.
This contest between a crazed, small-minded right-wing
ideologue and the moderate New Englander makes for interesting
political theater. But it also highlights the dysfunctionality
of our nation's discussion -- or lack of intelligent,
productive discussion -- about the public health and
criminal catastrophes associated with drug addiction.
Let's look for a minute at who the accuser really
is. Through his decades in the Senate, Helms has been
the foremost warrior for tobacco growers, protecting
government subsidies for a drug everyone knew was killing
millions of Americans.
That alone didn't make him unusual for a Southern
senator addicted to tobacco industry political money;
he was just better at fronting for those companies.
But then he used his committee chairmanship -- in which
he has shown himself willing to obstruct U.S. government
functions in embassies throughout the world to pursue
his narrow ideological crusades -- to become a pitch
man for hooking Third World populations on American
tobacco to make up for declining domestic sales. He
became North Carolina Tobacco's ambassador.
The most revealing moment of this ambassadorship came
in April 1996. Helms actually played host to a three-day
visit to his home state (including a private two-hour
tour of R.J. Reynolds' Winston-Salem tobacco factory)
of ambassadors of all seven countries in the Association
of Southeast Asian Nations. They all came, of course,
because they needed Helms' support on the Foreign Relations
Committee.
At the time, Helms was holding up the opening of a
U.S. embassy in Vietnam. That didn't stop him from personally
escorting Vietnam's ambassador around Washington. Nor
did it stop Vietnam from welcoming a $21 million joint
venture for RJR-Nabisco in Da Nang.
Helms actually said the following in praise of the
Vietnamese: "I was with some Vietnamese recently, and
some of them were smoking two cigarettes at the same
time. That's the kind of customers we need."
Now let's look at how William Weld has dealt with
the drug issue, both here and abroad.
As a U.S. Attorney in Massachusetts in the '80s, he
pushed for mandatory minimum sentences for drug dealers.
He busted up one of the world's largest marijuana smuggling
rings, as well as one of Boston's major cocaine rings.
He came before the (pre-Helms-run) Senate Foreign Relations
Committee to testify on behalf of a strict federal money
laundering law that eventually passed in 1986.
Then he came to Washington to head the criminal division
of President Reagan's Justice Department. That's right
-- Ronald Reagan, the president who made "war on drugs"
a national mantra. According to the head of the Drug
Enforcement Agency at the time, John C. Lawn, Weld played
a key role in boosting nationwide drug prosecutions
40 percent, and convictions 42 percent.
So what's Helms' gripe?
Weld flunks one of Helms' inane litmus tests. While
Weld took a hard line against drug dealers, he also
had the courage and intelligence to stand up for some
of the lesser-noticed victims of a blindly prosecuted
"drug war." Weld realized that marijuana has a role
in relieving the pain and nausea of cancer patients
undergoing chemotherapy. He supported the idea of helping
relieve that pain by allowing the limited, controlled
legalization of marijuana for that purpose.
And, as Massachusetts' governor, Weld saw how some
simple measures could help staunch the spread of the
deadly AIDS/HIV epidemic. Weld supported the idea of
free, clean needles for intravenous drug addicts --
a concept endorsed recently by the American Medical
Association. A concept that has saved thousands of lives.
Helm's contribution to that debate has been to condemn
all homosexuals for supposed promiscuity and to leave
them and others to die from AIDS.
Helms' real gripe is that Weld is a Republican just
like himself, but one who thinks for himself instead
of signing up to the list of simplistic, far-right-wing
slogans Helms champions.
Is this any way to conduct foreign policy?
I just wonder what will happen if marijuana becomes
legal and regulated. Tobacco companies will probably
"diversify" by carrying our their long-developed plans
to cultivate marijuana. If so, don't be surprised if
the Foreign Relations Committee embarrassment from North
Carolina suddenly forgets his "soft on drugs" litmus
test and goes off in search of yet another bogeyman.
Nick Pastore August 15, 1997
Nick Pastore is a Research Fellow in Police Policy
for the Criminal Justice Policy Foundation.